
07-06-2004, 03:08 PM
|
 |
The Queen
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 1,494
|
|
Another question for the gunnies
Is it possible to tell (without the gun as evidence) that two bullets fired into different people were fired from the same person's gun? Or would you just be able to tell they were shot by the same type of gun? OR are there any guns/ammo so rare that finding two people shot by that gun would almost certainly mean that they were shot by the same person?
Sorry if these questions sound stupid. I'm kicking around a story idea, but I know next to nothing about weapons.
Lisa
__________________
Certified member of the RJ Message Board ELITE Squad
|

07-06-2004, 03:16 PM
|
 |
Scooter
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Elgin, IL
Posts: 1,572
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lisa
Is it possible to tell (without the gun as evidence) that two bullets fired into different people were fired from the same person's gun? Or would you just be able to tell they were shot by the same type of gun? OR are there any guns/ammo so rare that finding two people shot by that gun would almost certainly mean that they were shot by the same person?
Sorry if these questions sound stupid. I'm kicking around a story idea, but I know next to nothing about weapons.
Lisa
|
Lisa,
Read some of the forensic information in the newspaper accounts of the DC Sniper. The authorities were able to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that one gun was used to shoot many, many different people.
The gunnies will be able to give exacting detail about rifling (spelling ok, guys?) and the like.
__________________
Scott Hajek
"A beer right now would sound good, but I'd rather drink one than listen to it."
|

07-06-2004, 03:21 PM
|
 |
World's Sexiest Me
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,912
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lisa
Is it possible to tell (without the gun as evidence) that two bullets fired into different people were fired from the same person's gun? Or would you just be able to tell they were shot by the same type of gun? OR are there any guns/ammo so rare that finding two people shot by that gun would almost certainly mean that they were shot by the same person?
Sorry if these questions sound stupid. I'm kicking around a story idea, but I know next to nothing about weapons.
Lisa
|
I abut next to nothing, but am interested to see if my iota of knowledge proves true. I am going to say that it is possible to determine whether the two bullets were fired by the same gun. My understanding is that each gun imprints some type of unique mark, kind of like a fingerprint, on each shell as it exits the gun. I'm am sure much greater erudition shall be forthcoming soon.
Scott
__________________
Scott
You need rhino skin if you're gonna begin to walk through this world.
You need elephant balls if you don't want to crawl on your hands through this world.
Tom Petty
|

07-06-2004, 03:22 PM
|
 |
AWOL
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 5,919
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scott Hajek
spelling ok, guys?
|
Looks good, Scott. You pass......this time! Bwahahaha!
Look up Ballistic Fingerprinting, Lisa. It seems to be a reasonably good way to identify a gun but not a gun owner since most guns used criminally are not registered. And I also now defer to the gunnies.
__________________
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. ... The piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.
~ Howard Phillips Lovecraft
|

07-06-2004, 03:24 PM
|
 |
World's Sexiest Me
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,912
|
|
Beating the gunnies to the punch
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jimbow8
Looks good, Scott. You pass......this time! Bwahahaha!
Look up Ballistic Fingerprinting, Lisa. It seems to be a reasonably good way to identify a gun but not a gun owner since most guns used criminally are not registered. And I also now defer to the gunnies.
|
Looks like we all wanted to get our 2 cents in before letting the experts run the show.
Scott
__________________
Scott
You need rhino skin if you're gonna begin to walk through this world.
You need elephant balls if you don't want to crawl on your hands through this world.
Tom Petty
|

07-06-2004, 04:04 PM
|
 |
AWOL
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 5,919
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scott Miller
Looks like we all wanted to get our 2 cents in before letting the experts run the show.
Scott
|
Well, it is a gun thread. Both Biggles and Ken will now go back and forth agreeing with each other for about 5 pages and talking about their gun experience. It is only fair that we get our licks in right at the beginning.
__________________
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. ... The piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.
~ Howard Phillips Lovecraft
|

07-06-2004, 06:16 PM
|
 |
Indian A-Law
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Resting down in Cornwall...
Posts: 3,830
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jimbow8
Well, it is a gun thread. Both Biggles and Ken will now go back and forth agreeing with each other for about 5 pages and talking about their gun experience. It is only fair that we get our licks in right at the beginning. 
|
Ha! Just for that, I have NOTHING TO SAY!
__________________
http://www.indianalaw.to/
Link to a video by the OTHER Paul Stanko:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbkLoAvmMKw
(No relation!)
'Mama always told me not to look into the eyes of the sun. But mama, that's where the fun is"
--Manfred Mann.
The eternal Thompson gunner
still wandering through the night
Now it's ten years later but he still keeps up the fight
In Ireland, in Lebanon, in Palestine and Berkeley
Patty Hearst heard the burst of Roland's Thompson gun and bought it.--Warren Zevon
|

07-06-2004, 10:37 PM
|
 |
Scooter
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Elgin, IL
Posts: 1,572
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Biggles
Ha! Just for that, I have NOTHING TO SAY! 
|
That has got to be a first. Everyone mark this day down in history.
__________________
Scott Hajek
"A beer right now would sound good, but I'd rather drink one than listen to it."
|

07-06-2004, 11:00 PM
|
 |
AWOL
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 5,919
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scott Hajek
That has got to be a first. Everyone mark this day down in history. 
|
I added it to the calendar.
__________________
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. ... The piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.
~ Howard Phillips Lovecraft
|

07-07-2004, 05:09 AM
|
 |
Day-ve
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 948
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scott Miller
I abut next to nothing, but am interested to see if my iota of knowledge proves true. I am going to say that it is possible to determine whether the two bullets were fired by the same gun. My understanding is that each gun imprints some type of unique mark, kind of like a fingerprint, on each shell as it exits the gun. I'm am sure much greater erudition shall be forthcoming soon.
Scott
|
Would this require the shells though? Does the damaging part of the bullet have unique marks? If so, how?
Dave (as curious as Lisa)
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 AM.
|